|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 29 post(s) |
Peter Drakon
Independent Traders and Builders
MPA
5
   |
Posted - 2012.05.27 08:33:00 -
[1] - Quote
@Soundwave: the index (tree) panel width is % based, thus when you resize the inventory the index panel width changes too. Maybe it's just me, but I set it to a specific size, so I can read everything I want to. When I resize the inventory I'd like the tree to remain the same width I have set it before.
@Players: reverting back is not going to happen, that can not be done in a way it would make any sense. I know it sounds so easy: "revert the code back!". It is not, and never has been easy; not on a codebase this size and complex. However they can change the inventroy, they can go forward, and shape it how you ask them to. That they have not changed it before release based on the sisi feedback was a huge mistake, but it can not be undone now. They have apologized for that, now they have to move forward. It is time for you too to do the same, either way. |
Peter Drakon
Independent Traders and Builders
MPA
5
|
Posted - 2012.05.27 09:28:00 -
[2] - Quote
Callidus Dux wrote:
But for sure! REbuild the old UI with the new CODE. This may take time but is possible. What once was present can be there again.
Just compile the code!
I said done in a sensible way, what you suggest may take many weeks, maybe one or two month to do so. In that time they can do many improvments to the new. |
Peter Drakon
Independent Traders and Builders
MPA
5
|
Posted - 2012.05.27 09:30:00 -
[3] - Quote
Jebediah MacAhab Dallocort wrote:
But it is easy. They have a goddamn version control system, all they have to do is git checkout CRUCIBLE_1_2_3 or whatever they tagged it. If they were dumb and didn't tag it, they can still look at their commit log.
And revert the whole database? Your progress on the last week? Your wealth? The missile effects too? And some million other things we don't know about? |
Peter Drakon
Independent Traders and Builders
MPA
5
|
Posted - 2012.05.27 12:53:00 -
[4] - Quote
disasteur wrote:yeah you have a point, seems a good strategy from CCP to wait until its to late for a roleback
I did not say I like it, I'm in a WH, this new feature makes my life harder, and not by a bit. I said we should move forward, because moving back is not an option. |
Peter Drakon
Independent Traders and Builders
MPA
5
|
Posted - 2012.05.27 13:03:00 -
[5] - Quote
Callidus Dux wrote:...The first improvement MUST BE to rebuild ALL the functions of the old UI including hundreds of available windows. If YOU dont like this idea fine. ...
At this stage I don't like the new feature either, it has serious bugs and design flaws. (I do like to have open 5-10 windows too.) But let us move forward, and let them improve this new thing. It may actualy work. |
Peter Drakon
Independent Traders and Builders
MPA
5
|
Posted - 2012.05.27 13:19:00 -
[6] - Quote
Ribikoka wrote:The missile effects is part of the inventory ? The amarr ship colours is part of the inventory ? The frigate cosmetics is part of the inventory ? The inventory not necessary for saving your skillpoints to database. Dont be fool. ...
You talking idiotic things. So, stop it.
I answered the question "why can't they just revert back to a previous version?" - in that context my answer was correct, they can not do that. Reverting back to a previous version would also mean to roll back everything, including the database.
Your statement is correct in a logical level, these features are not part of each other, but they are in a single code base, and thus can not be separated easily (only with a lot of work). The moment since they have merged the new feature branches into a single code base, they can not move back, they can only move forward, and fix this new inventory. |
Peter Drakon
Independent Traders and Builders
MPA
5
|
Posted - 2012.05.27 13:28:00 -
[7] - Quote
Krystyn wrote:And they can move forward with a lot less people playing the game...
They did made a huge error releasing this. They have apologiezed, and this is the priority now to fix. Thats all they can do. |
|
|
| |
|